“Why do you give such high ratings to all the books you review?”
It’s a fair question, and not the first time I’ve been asked. The answer is simple. I don’t review books I know I won’t like. That doesn’t mean I only accept them from a particular genre, but rather that I triage the ones I read. If I can tell right away that I won’t like it, I don’t accept it for a review. If I get a few chapters into it and realize my review will be under three stars, I tell the author. (Not one has ever asked that I go ahead with the review.)
I was adding a review to Goodreads recently for a book that had almost all five-star reviews and noticed there was one reviewer who only gave it two stars. I was curious, so I looked at that review. The reviewer said he thought the book was well done, and acknowledged great plot and terrific writing. But, he said, he didn’t generally read that kind of book, and didn’t really feel qualified to comment on it. I wanted to shake him. That two-star I-dunno was a review. It needlessly lowered an otherwise outstanding score.
Then there was the reviewer who gave one of my books a one-star rating with no explanation. Okay, I know you’re not supposed to respond, but I admit it. I was curious. I looked at that reviewer’s history and saw that she gave every book in my genre a one star review—on the average of over fifty books a day. Either she was a hella-fast reader, or she was a complete jerk. (I can’t be the only one who thought it was the latter, because shortly after I complained, I noticed that ALL her reviews disappeared.)
“But wait,” you say. “Don’t you, O Book Reviewer, have a duty to your review-reading audience to warn them about the books that aren’t good?”
Well, no.
I have a duty to tell you about the ones I like, and what I like about them. But it’s incredibly hard and incredibly wonderful to finish writing a book. Just because I don’t like one, it doesn’t mean others will have the same objections. There may be millions of people (just look at all the Fifty Shades sales) who like books I loathe.
Here’s the thing. The best—and worst—part about making the review process available to everyone is that the market can really help steer people to books they’d like. I turn down well over half of the review requests I get. I tell the authors I’m not a good fit to review their book and suggest they send it elsewhere. That’s not just me being polite. If there is a reader somewhere who can convincingly tell what they like about that book, then they are far more qualified to be its reviewer than I.
So no, I won’t write that review.
But that doesn’t mean you shouldn’t!
…well said, m’Lady, Barb.. reblogging this 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
Reblogged this on Seumas Gallacher and commented:
…well said, m’Lady, Barb Taub.. reblogging this 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
Wow! A Seumas reblog. Score!
LikeLike
Reblogged this on Down Home Thoughts and commented:
Excellent thoughts Barb! My grandma always said, “if you can’t say something nice, don’t say nothing at all.”
LikeLiked by 1 person
My grandma always said, “Well, were you under their bed?” Obviously, you had a MUCH more polite grandma!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Like you, I select and buy the books I WANT to read and if I’m not enjoying what I’m reading, I stop and move onto another book (without reviewing the book I didn’t like)
Why?
Because life’s too short to waste time being miserable 🙂
Having said that, I have given 1, 2 or 3 star ratings (and the reasons, mainly flawed research and misleading information) to educational books for kids that should have lived up to their promise and I had no way of discussing things with the authors.
LikeLiked by 6 people
I don’t review technical or educational books, but I have to agree that the standards—presumably objective ones—would be different. But when it comes to books that (presumably) people read for entertainment, I think that the standards are so subjective that all I can do is say what appeals to me and why.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Agreed Barb (I read books for pleasure and entertainment as well as educational – my own and for kids in general) 😀
LikeLiked by 1 person
I understand and totally agree with you. Most of my reviews are 4 or 5 star, not because all books are great, but I only finish those that are. If it’s not my genre, I say in the review “I can’t compare this to others in the genre, but I like it for these reasons.”
LikeLiked by 2 people
I think the “did not finish” is such a kiss of death. But I completely agree with you that it boils down to a subjective judgement call.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you and we’ll said. I like your policy as both a reader and a writer:)
LikeLiked by 1 person
Why, thank you so much!
LikeLiked by 1 person
This is an excellent policy to uphold, and you do make it perfectly clear how and why you will review books. “I’m not a good fit to review their book” works for me. Nothing personal in that, but the book may possibly fit elsewhere. It’s the kindest thing too that publishers can say in a rejection letter, as well as being true, because publishers can’t be expected to publish every single manuscript that crosses their desks. Nor should authors expect reviewers, like you, to read and review every book you are sent. The service you provide is very valuable and authors need to realize they cannot expect reviews just for the asking. Receiving a good review is a result of having written a great book. And reviewers decide just how great these books are – not the authors. Thanks for a great blog post!
LikeLiked by 2 people
“From your lips to god’s ears”, as my grandma also used to say. Thank you for your articulate and dead-on comment!
LikeLiked by 2 people
Interesting approach, and bravo for being honest. To be honest, I like to read a spectrum of review ratings about a book because I think it is unrealistic that everyone will feel the same about a book. I’m not sure that serious good readers would just dismiss a book on an average score without looking more deeply into the reasons behind it. It’s pretty easy to work out whose being harsh and whose on the same wavelength as me by reading between the lines. Anything else just smells a bit like PR
LikeLike
The problem is that the “just being harsh” reviews drag down an overall score. And (especially with Amazon) that has direct consequences for how the book ends up in overall rankings, how visible it is to customers, and its overall sales.
I used to see this when I was in HR too. Some managers felt that to get an above average rating, an employee should walk on water. Others felt that it was appropriate as long as the person made it in each day and was breathing on their own. The problem isn’t just with the review system there…it translated directly into income and chance for advancement. Ultimately, it hurt good employees and it hurt the company because those were the very ones who could, and did, leave.
I didn’t say that someone should give a falsely high ranking. Quite the opposite. What I’m saying is that if you can’t list things you like about a book, indeed if you don’t like the book at all, it doesn’t really help anyone for you to review it.
Of course, I can and do point out weaknesses and things I don’t like in the books I enjoy. But overall, just to post a review panning a book doesn’t help readers (who wouldn’t read it anyway) or writers (who managed the achievement of a finished book).
LikeLike
I completely agree. I did write a post on the same subject very recently and we seem to be on a pretty similar wavelength. Enjoy your reading!
LikeLiked by 1 person
I just read your brilliant post at
https://olganm.wordpress.com/2015/03/03/whats-your-opinion-of-book-reviews-should-authors-review-please-readers-dont-be-shy/.
You said it better than I ever could.
LikeLike
I agree with your reviewing rationale completely, Barb. Like you, I only review books that I have enjoyed and leave people to make their own minds up about books that aren’t my cup of tea 😀
LikeLiked by 2 people
Have people ever complained about your policy?
LikeLike
Yes, I think people assume I’m over generous when in reality, like you, I wouldn’t post a review if I thought I couldn’t be positive about it. I can’t see the point in being negative when it would only be my opinion and other readers may feel differently.
LikeLiked by 2 people
That’s my review policy also, Barb. If I can’t give it 4 or 5 stars, I don’t review it at all.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I couldn’t agree more. The way I see it, we don’t get paid to write reviews. Since I’m going to devote time to this, it might as well be time well-spent on a fun or interesting read.
LikeLike
Well said! I wish more people took this approach.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks, Cate! I really appreciate your kind words.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Good piece, Bard. You’re being more than fair. 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
Sorry for the typo misspelling you name, Barb. 😦
LikeLike
Thanks for the words of encouragement!
And don’t worry about the spelling. I still have my very first published piece–credited to “Barb Toad”. Compared to that, I’ll take being called “bard” as a writerly compliment!
LikeLike
I know whatcha mean. On my book review blog, all my own choices have at least 4 stars because if I can’t give a book that many stars I won’t want to read it anyway (I don’t accept requests). However, the books I review for Rosie are something different; I’ve only ever declined to review one, after reading 60% and realising that I couldn’t have even given it 3*.
I don’t think that reviewers have any sort of responsibility to ‘warn’ readers about books that are a bit crap, but sometimes a less than positive review does provide balance. When deciding whether or not to buy a book, I always read the bad reviews first. If they say that, for instance, it is full of bad grammar or that the person just can’t write, and if it seems intelligent and considered, then I’ll probably ignore all the two lines ones from people who’ve never reviewed anything else, that say it’s the best book they’ve ever read.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I have to agree with you, even to checking out the bad reviews. I’m just not willing to devote the time to reviewing a book that doesn’t entertain me.
When it comes to spelling/grammar/syntax, I have a 3-strike rule. If I’ve made three edit-fail notes that haven’t been offset by three hell-yeah notes, I send a note to the author and decline the review.
Sure, there are always exceptions. Kylie Scott’s grab-and-won’t-let-go Stage Dive series is a ton of fun despite the absolutely appalling edit fails throughout. I grimace, but I don’t put them down.
So actually, I suppose it’s more like….
LikeLike
Wow – I love the 3 striike rule, Barb. I think I subconsciously do that but didn’t realise until you verbalised it 😀
LikeLiked by 1 person
LOL Love the video clip. That’s how I feel about rules too.
But I’m a bit more forgiving of a few typos in published books since I’ve been writing myself. It’s so hard to catch them all. I have a note in the back of each book asking readers to contact me if they spot errors. (That way, they are less likely to mention them in their reviews.) I still get emails occasionally about my first book, which has been edited and proofread so many times it’s ridiculous. Just this week someone wrote and pointed out that I had “intro” instead of “into” in one spot in that book. Sheez!!
LikeLiked by 1 person
I think of it more as the weight of the book. If I’m well into an entertaining read, an edit fail here or there won’t pull me out of the story with the whole weight of a good tale to balance that. But if I’m only in a page or two and there are already multiple errors to distract me, I’m probably going to give up. I think the message is that you can NOT proof your own stuff (and in most cases you’re mother can’t either) . So you need to have it professionally edited. Oh yeah, and you need to write a good book too.
LikeLike
Pure wisdom! Why should anyone force their way through a book they are not enjoying? Your review philosophy is what authors (at least the ones I know) hope for and respect. I’ll be joining the many others in reblogging! Thanks!
LikeLiked by 2 people
Thanks so much for your kind words! (I absolutely love the way you let me justify my essentially lazy reading priorities…)
LikeLike
I do the same. I have an occasional feature on my blog: Books I’ve Known and Loved. I have no desire to trash other people’s hard work. I like celebrating the positive. I should have known but never imagined that some weird people enjoyed spending time writing LONG bad reviews. I think maybe they’re influenced by the way reviews are done by “the experts” on TV–sometimes viciously. The average Joe/Jane can suddenly be a “star” critic as they sit bitterly before their computer. Sad little lives, I say.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I find it astonishing that so many people find it worth their time to be mean. I’ve seen it in writing groups, and in online critique sites—people who are willing to let blood in the name of ‘constructive’ criticism. But I just don’t have time to read things that aren’t fun, and I really don’t have time to go into detail—publicly—about what makes them un-fun for me.
I admit that I used to try, off-the-record, to tell people what was wrong IMHO with their books. You know what? They NEVER hear it. They never thank me for taking the time to make suggestions. And they are right. It’s their book, and for all I know it will find an audience (which, hopefully, doesn’t care about grammar/plot/pacing/or even spelling issues…) After all, look at Fifty Shades…
LikeLike
This is my stance on reviews exactly!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Reblogged this on Claudette Melanson, Author of Dark Fantasy and commented:
Reblogging!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks so much for the reblog! I really appreciate it.
LikeLike
Reblogged this on A Woman's Wisdom and commented:
Well said, Barb 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you so much for the reblog.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Reblogged this on Anita & Jaye Dawes.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Reblogged this on The Raven's Quill and commented:
This post perfrctly sums up my own feelings on all matters review.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I really appreciate the reblog. Thanks so much.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I can’t reblog this on my site though I would if I could – excellent post and policy Barb. All reviewers put a huge amount of time aside, voluntarily, to read and review many, many books and I think it’s a very good point about not trashing a bad book because you’ve forced your way through it when it’s really not your thing. We all love reading different books and a bad review might put someone off from trying something that they would love. I made a resolution some time ago now that I would review all books that I read BUT in order to do that I do the same as you – I triage because I don’t have the time to read something I would only give 1 or 2 stars to – life’s too short!!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks Mary! Good luck with that resolution.
LikeLike
Thanks for your candor and explicitness, Barb. Both are valuable. However, I do question several of your premises, all of which, in my opinion, make you a “sunshine reader/reviewer” rather than a serious reviewer.
1) Why are your opinions about a book only valuable and worth sharing when you have something rather positive to report but not after you have something rather negative to report? That is illogical. Either we should value your opinions (and you should as well) or we shouldn’t. Which is it?
2) If you want to be known as a serious, professional-level reviewer, you HAVE to read a variety of books and give an appropriate variety of rankings to read books. If you want to be an amateur/armchair/hobbyist reviewer, do whatever you want.
Which are you? If you want to be seen as a professional, start reading more types of books than what you “love” (which you seem to determine after reading a very small part of a book, fewer than 3 chapters!) and read for assessing quality, willing to present that to your followers even when it’s below 4 stars.
3) Do you believe you have a relationship to the people who read your reviews, that you want them to trust you and your reviews as “honest”? If so, how can you eliminate the types of reviews/books from your site that show your honest opinions when these opinions are mixed are negative? I would not trust a reviewer who only displays positive reviews.
4) if you can’t continue reading a book for its poor quality, why don’t you believe you have a duty to your followers to report this poor quality and give your reasons for the DNF?
About me: I am NOT a professional reviewer since I’m trying to focus on my writing. I am a reviewer/reader who has been and can be a professional editor, writing teacher and proofreader. I am also an author as well as blogger. I am qualified and could be a professional reviewer, but I choose not to make reviewing (or reading) my primary activities. Plus, most of the books I pick up lately are not worth my time, unfortunately.
I never tell a reviewer not to post a review of my books if they have read the entire book and are willing to post their opinions. I thank them. Check my reviews and blog if you don’t believe me: I post them all.
I do not appreciate or honor DNF “reviews,” and dislike intensely that anyone who doesn’t finish (or even read) a book can still post a ranking or review. I am interested in DNFs’ reasons for not finishing or continuing and am glad when they give them.
I also give an author a chance to respond when I find I cannot give a ranking above 3 stars to their book. I give them my reasons, I offer to help. NONE of them have thanked me and some have accused me of attacking them personally when I gave professional-level editing advice. Sheesh.
If more professional reviewers would be willing to read and finish less-than-enjoyable books and give honest reviews, we’d all be better off.
I am not trying to upset you, but I am curious as to how you will respond.
best to you,
Sally
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks Sally, for your obviously heartfelt thoughts. I confess that it never occurred to me that I have to read and report on crap in order for my other reviews to be taken seriously. But since I do this for free, the only cost to anyone is my time.
And my time is worth a hell of a lot.
If someone wants to pay me buckets of money to compensate for the time I’d have to invest in reporting on books I don’t enjoy, then they’re welcome to step up. Meanwhile, at the risk of someone not taking the reviews seriously, I’ll have to continue to avoid reviewing stuff that’s just plain not good—or not good to me.
LikeLiked by 2 people
OK, I’m going to chime in with a differing opinion. A lonely cry, I realize, but nevertheless . . .
I’m a reader and a blogger. I got contacted about a year ago by a small publisher asking me if I would review (and blog about) one of their titles. I declined because book reviews are not part of my blog content. Anyway, that contact got me thinking more about book reviews, which I had not really considered much before, even though I’ve spent a lifetime reading books mostly on the recommendation of reviewers.
So as a reader, I’d like to respond to the “I-only-give-four-and-five-star-reviews” perspective–I dismiss those reviews, and consequently, those reviewers (who may be authors, as well). I have a lifetime of reading behind me, and there are maybe a couple of handfuls of books that that I would give FOUR stars to, let alone five, so it’s hard for me to trust the opinion of a reviewer who finds book after book after book that deserves 4 or 5 stars.
And I understand folks saying they don’t bother to review books they hate, so of course all their reviews are going to be 4 and 5 stars. Yes, I guess that makes sense, I suppose, but it certainly creates the impression that they like everything and, as a book buyer, I’m not sure I can rely on their opinion because, at best, it seems to be indiscriminate.
Further, there is a point between love and hate, isn’t there? I’m sure there is, otherwise we’d only have two stars instead of five. 😉
I hope this comment doesn’t sound too harsh, I’m just trying to make a point about the impact on credibility when a reviewer only publishes 4 & 5 star reviews.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks for your (always articulate!) thoughts, Karen. As I read your comment, it seems there are three things you’re saying.
First, you have a clear vision of what your blog is and your own role. That’s an important and priceless realization and—along with your creative and amazing talent—is probably what has contributed greatly to your success.
Second, you disagree with the review-inflation of giving four and five stars. In other words, your personal interpretation of what stars mean might differ from mine. YES! But until the Review Gods chisel the exact meaning onto stone tablets, it will continue to be subjective. That’s why I state in my submission guidelines exactly what the star-levels mean to me.
And finally, the reason I wrote this post is to point out that I don’t give everything I read a big star award. I just only write reviews for the ones that do. The reason is simple. I have a busy life. (And a publisher waiting for my next book.) Writing careful reviews takes a lot of time, so I’m only willing to invest my time in the ones that interest me the most.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Authors should realize it is a lot to ask of someone to read their book, and then expect them to write up something nice about it.
Be happy that we live in an age where we have unprecedented availability of millions of books and an ability to communicate our love of them!
Thanks, Barb.
LikeLiked by 2 people
What an incredibly nice way to look at it. Thanks!
LikeLike
A great post, Barb. I think reviewers who provide a range of reviews should be applauded, even encouraged, but it doesn’t mean everybody has to do the same. I’m like you, I don’t review books I haven’t enjoyed as I don’t see that as my role. I just promote the ones I’ve read and loved.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Thanks, Dylan. I have to agree with you—plus it’s a lot more fun that way!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Barb, I agree wholeheartedly with your reasoning. I don’t get paid for reviews, so I am not going to waste my time reading and writing a review on something I don’t enjoy. I won’t read books in genres that I don’t enjoy. If someone wants me to do that, they should be paying me for my efforts. I will give a three star rating, but I turn down anything less. I just don’t understand someone shredding a book or an author because it isn’t to their liking – hopefully that author will find an audience who appreciates what they’ve written.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Amen, sister! There are plenty of books I don’t like, from (yes, I confess!) Lord of the Rings to Fifty Shades. But I’m not going to slog through them and then do the hard work of telling the world why I didn’t have a good time on the journey. The time I’ve spent trying to read that crap-to-me stuff is a sunk cost. I don’t have to waste even more time describing why.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I love your post. I don’t consider myself a reviewer, but I do leave reviews of books I read. I also only leave reviews when I like a book. I have had to tell a couple authors that I call myself a “book recommender” rather than a reviewer.
LikeLiked by 1 person
“Book recommender”—I LOVE that!
LikeLike
As an author I feel a review of critique is essential. Good or bad (good is better obviously) it gets your work in the public eye. I have written two novels and both have had good reviews, not to boast however it also lets me as the author know if I am doing things right for the reader.
LikeLiked by 1 person
The problem with the “all publicity is good publicity” theory is that given the way Amazon and other sellers count reviews, low star ratings actually do great harm. I don’t see any reason to inflict that on writers who’ve actually achieved a finished book. That’s not to say my reviews are all marshmallows and rainbows. If there are things in the book that I find weak, I mention them.
And yes, as a writer, of course it would be helpful to me to hear constructive criticism. A three-star review from a reader who sees that as the definition of a good book and who offers a thoughtful critique is welcome and helpful. A three-star review from someone who says they don’t really read this kind of thing and don’t particularly like it? Not so much.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Wow, Barb, this post generated a lot of comments. My five cents worth is short – I thought your own “rules” for reviewing are spot on. I can’t post a review on a book that I couldn’t recommend. And as a writer, I know how hard it is to write and publish a book. If you excoriate a book, it’s like telling a new mother they just gave birth to a really ugly baby. But I am okay with having a private chat with the writer, if they want it. Haven’t done that yet.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks, Noelle. I usually tell the moms, “Your baby looks so healthy!” I remember telling my kids after their school orchestra concert that “It was good and loud!” Wonder what the writerly equivalent would be?
LikeLike
Well said. It was lovely to read this because I am exactly the same. If I start to read a book I don’t like, or even if I finish it, I don’t leave a review because I do believe you only have to read the diverse reactions to the classics to realise what it comes down to is a matter of personal taste. My review is my tip to the author for a book I’ve thoroughly enjoyed. Good for you 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
I never thought of it like a tip. (Not much tipping here in the UK!) But I love that concept!
LikeLike
I totally agree, I only write reviews for books I’m pretty confident I will like and give at least a 3 star review to.
LikeLike
Reblogged this on Patricia Sands' Blog and commented:
There are so many great blogs that I follow, it’s hard to find time to keep up with them. I try my best though because there’s always something to learn or to laugh about or commiserate with. It feels a bit like taking a liberty to refer to these writers as friends, but they do come to feel like they truly are. I know sometimes I miss out on reading important posts, but I’m so glad I did not miss this one. Barb Taub tackles the sometimes sensitive issue of being a book reviewer in the best post I’ve ever read on the topic. I hope you will find a few minutes to see what she has to say and leave your own comment. Thanks, Barb !
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you so much for the reblog. I’m SO flattered!
LikeLike
I feel exactly the same. Great post.
LikeLike
Reblogged this on Author Jennifer Senhaji and commented:
Great article. This is the same reason why I will decline to review if I can’t give a 3 star or higher. Just because I didn’t like the book doesn’t mean I want to discourage readers who may.
LikeLike
Pingback: REBLOG~Why I Won't Review Your Book -
Great post, Barb. so good, I gave you full credit and wrote my own post about the same topic. It’s at http://anngimpel.blogspot.com/ if you want to check it out.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I was referred to your post from Patricia Sands’ reblog. What you wrote here struck a chord with me. I’m neither an avid reader nor a reviewer (but not quite a complete illiterate). I appreciate your sincerity about this subject. A few books have come my way written by nice people, but their tomes have made my eyes glaze over. I feel bad about that. I’d rather write no review than a bad review because I know how hard it is to write a book. In addition, I don’t want to contribute to destroying someone’s spirit or to hurt their sales. Basically, I’m just not cut out to be a reviewer.
LikeLike
Well good for you Barb! I’ve often wondered why anyone would want to slog through a book they don’t like. I’ve also heard a lot about reviewers on Amazon and others who purposely either give a low star rating or a high star rating for no other reason than to mess up the ratings (or boost them) for their personal reasons and it’s a shame not only because this falsifies the ratings but because this could be a way to help the reader find something he might actually be interested in, so those false ratings just gum up the works.
LikeLiked by 1 person
You are so right. On the one hand, I think it’s incredibly exciting to live in a time with so much free access that the entire internet is basically a giant bookclub. On the other hand, some members of that bookclub are pond slime. (Except that’s probably being unfair to pond slime…)
LikeLike
Great approach to reviewing. Especially since–if we’re willing to give into our worst impulses, and who isn’t now and again (and again, and again)–bad reviews are, in their way, more fun to write. Dorothy Parker is said to have written of an actor, “She ran the gamut of emotion from A to B.” When someone (and it may have been the actor herself) confronted her about it, she admitted that it hadn’t been a bad performance, she’d just thought the line was too funny to pass up.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Have to admit that my worst impulses are the most fun. And who can ever resist a Dorothy Parker quote?
“That would be a good thing for them to cut on my tombstone: Wherever she went, including here, it was against her better judgment.”
LikeLike
Pingback: Ten things I loved about you, 2015 | Barb Taub