You say stereoTYPE and I say stereoTROPE. Did we both just say a dirty word?
As readers of this blog know, I like tropes. Even when they are so incredibly overused that they go from being a useful shortcut to an absolute stereotrope. What is a stereotrope? There are lots of definitions, ranging from a 3D animation machine to “…an interactive experiment, exploring a set of tropes authored by the community on tvtropes.org that are categorized as being always female or always male.” [check out the entertaining page on http://stereotropes.bocoup.com/!]
But I think of stereotropes as the things that everybody “knows”. Little girls like ponies. Women love shoes. Men don’t cry. Everyone hates mimes. (Well, maybe that last one is a universal truth…)

Zeus: “Are you aiming for some of these people?!” John: “No… maybe that mime…” [Die Hard 3–Taxi through Central Park]
![[image credit: VOX]](https://barbtaub.files.wordpress.com/2015/11/red_cup.gif?w=300&h=252)
[image credit: VOX]
A Bad Word in Writing Fiction: Stereotypes, Making Them Work For You
Guest Post By S.K.Nicholls
The word stereotype conjures up all sorts of negative connotations in our mind when we hear it. We are taught that stereotyping is a bad thing to do. At worst, stereotypes contribute to intolerance and discrimination and limit people in their understanding of society. Yet, the word exists for a reason. Our brains are hardwired to recognize patterns, especially in visual clues. Stereotypes will continue to exist as long as there is diversity and a tendency in the human brain to compartmentalize knowledge as a way of reducing “thinking effort”.
Denying the existence of stereotypes doesn’t help anyone. If anything, we should talk openly about them and try to understand how they affect our thinking—and how they factor into fiction.
A stereotype is a widely held but fixed and oversimplified image or idea of a particular type. It can be used to describe places (the city jungle, the hills, the bayou), people, (dumb blonde, female caregiver, biker dude), things (burka, peace sign, ten-gallon hat).
Stereotypes can be used to quickly place a setting in fiction. The mid-west, the south, a swamp, all give us a quick image pulled up from our subconscious. Characters, just like people, make good or bad first impressions. While we recognize that stereotypes are unfair, we can’t avoid running an inventory of them when we first meet someone new. Our biology sets us up to recall in this way.
Possible prejudicial effects of stereotypes are:
- Justification of ill-founded prejudices or ignorance
- Unwillingness to rethink one’s attitudes and behavior towards stereotyped groups or places
- Preventing some people of stereotyped groups from entering or succeeding in activities or fields.
![[image credit: Nick Perks for Comic Book Resources] http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/line2-29-7.jpg](https://barbtaub.files.wordpress.com/2015/11/line2-29-7.jpg?w=529&h=419)
[image credit: Nick Perks for Comic Book Resources]
http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/line2-29-7.jpg
How can the stereotype be used to the writer’s and the reader’s advantage?
- When we introduce a character for the first time, a stereotype is a character the reader will recognize and believe to know. But that’s also when our interest in him ends, and we won’t engage with him. However, if he breaks the stereotype, we become alert and curious about him. The part of our brain that seeks to integrate new information will immediately start to pay more attention because of that deviation from the comfort zone of stereotyping. Of course, you don’t have to use stereotypes in first impressions, but it’s easier for readers to start from and correct a shallow first impression, then to become interested in a one-dimensional character without face or contour.
“That’s part of the power of stereotypes—they set up expectations, so you can surprise your reader.” Orson Scott Card, “Characters and Viewpoint”
- Stereotypes can also be used to blend walk-on characters into the background without distracting the reader from the protagonist. The fill-in character can accomplish their role without chopping off a splinter of emotional engagement from the reader. The easiest way to make them feel like real people, without wasting so much as a paragraph on describing them, is to appeal to subconscious stereotypes.
Basically, the rule of thumb when using stereotypes in fiction is this – things that seem instantly familiar drop into the background, while things that break our expectations even by a little stand out.
![[image credit: TV Tropes] https://www.google.com/url?sa=i&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=images&cd=&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0CAUQjhxqFQoTCJSzw9uxkckCFUnzHgodU1YAOw&url=http%3A%2F%2Ftvtropes.org%2Fpmwiki%2Fpmwiki.php%2FMain%2FNeverMessWithGranny&psig=AFQjCNE-CmYK6WkxnqiaFX6_vLjRGmUeYQ&ust=1447640915386669](https://barbtaub.files.wordpress.com/2015/11/yolanda_golden_eagle_3352.jpg?w=529)
[image credit: TV Tropes]
Depending on the story you write, you can use stereotypes for comical effect (the hardened criminal who has to dress like a nun to rob a church), to create contrast with other characters (the cowboy who walks into a Texas bar to be greeted by a bartender with a Scottish accent), to generate controversy (the single mom who is highly qualified for a new job but gets disqualified when she mentions her children). Or you can use stereotypes for an educational purpose. For example, by portraying a character’s struggle to overcome an offensive stereotype he’s being pushed into, or by giving an antagonist a stereotypical thinking and showing how it contributes to his demise in the end. Some of the best works in fiction have been about people trying to overcome an adverse environment, and the damaging stereotypes people use against them.
Think of “the unpopular high school girl”…everybody has an image of her. A stereotype. Stephen King’s “Carrie” was not only a story of supernatural telekinesis but every unpopular high school girl’s dream of revenge
In this global age of social media, our instincts are to avoid and shun stereotypes at all costs. Political correctness prevents us from being associated with any kind of injustice toward “other people” and from being branded as ignorant and insensitive.
Blazing Saddles, 1974—because nobody subverts a stereotype like Mel Brooks!
But it also has a downside for writers because it makes us become afraid to offend somebody with our stories. This systematic avoidance of anything that might be interpreted as offensive can lead to cookie-cutter and bland fiction, with characters that don’t stand out because they don’t stand for anything!
“Firefly: War Stories (#1.9)” (2002)
Use them to evidence strength of character. Use them to the advantage of the story, as well as to the advantage of the reader.
Stereotype doesn’t have to be a dirty word, if it’s treated with respect.

For more about S.K. Nichols, author of Red Clay and Roses, see http://redclayandroses1.wordpress.com/
S.K. Nicholls is the author of “Red Clay and Roses”, a historical novel of life in the Deep South during the time of Jim Crow Law, and before Roe vs. Wade. Women were supposed to keep quiet and serve, abortion was illegal, adoption difficult, and racism rampant. The discovery of an old ledger opens a window into the dynamics of the 1950s-60s.
Her next release, “Naked Alliances”, is a wacko Florida crime fiction novel with an amusing, if not hilarious, comedic undercurrent throughout, starring Richard Noggin, P.I., a laid back investigator whose experience has been limited to domestic cases, and Brandi, a transsexual exotic dancer who is trying to outrun a ring of sex traffickers who are after a girl that has been dumped on her doorstep…as they team up to try to solve a cold case murder for the former mayor.
Red Clay and Roses by S. K. Nicholls

A fictionalized true story of life in the Deep South during the time of Jim Crow Law, and before Roe vs. Wade. Women were supposed to keep quiet and serve, abortion was illegal, adoption difficult, and racism rampant. The discovery of an old ledger opens a window into the dynamics of the 1950s-60s. Unspoken secrets are shared between Beatrice, The Good Doctor’s wife, and Moses Grier, their black handyman. The Grier’s daughter, Althea, suffers a tragedy that leaves her family silent and mournful. Her brother, Nathan, a medical student, looks for answers from a community that is deaf, blind, and dumb. A summer romance between Nathan and Sybil, an independent, high-spirited, white woman, leaves more unresolved. Nathan is thrust into the center of the Civil Rights Movement. Sybil is torn between living the mundane life of her peers, or a life that involves fastening herself to a taboo relationship. Witness social progress through the eyes of those who lived it!
What a very interesting and insightful post, SK. I enjoyed today’s lesson (in the ‘you learn something new every day’ and ‘writing is a constant learning process’ series!)
Well done Barb for the top presentation, as usual!!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you, Terry. It was a fun one to put together and thank you, Barb, for helping me out with the spot on visuals! You’re fantastic!
LikeLiked by 1 person
I agree Terry! This is a fascinating topic and Susan did a terrific job with it.
LikeLike
Such an interesting post S.K. – I’m building my cast list for my next novel at the moment and there are some horrendous stereotypes in there that I’m wondering what to do with but think after reading this I shall revisit and see if I actually need to do anything with them! Thanks 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks Georgia. Just as an artist adds familiar lines and colors to his painting the creative writer can color up a story with stereotypes.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I really like her approach that says some stereotypes are just shortcuts, while others can really give a character some punch if the stereotype is just subverted a bit.
LikeLike
Nice seeing Sue over here today. Good points in the post too.
LikeLike
Thanks Craig…since I’ve been absent on my blog for quite sometime…it’s nice to get out and about. 🙂
LikeLiked by 2 people
You’re welcome at my place any time you like.
LikeLiked by 1 person
What a really interesting – and useful post. Thank you Sue and Barb.
LikeLiked by 1 person
My pleasure. You’re very welcome.
LikeLiked by 2 people
I know in Stephen King’s memoir, On Writing, he mentions that Carrie can’t be too specific in the details or she will actually destroy the reader’s image of her. He says that we insert our own outcast girl from our school experiences; therefore, it he were to describe Carrie too specifically, he would accidentally shatter our picture of the outcast. In a sense, she’s a stereotype that we know intimately from school that totally busts out and surprises (and scares) the hell out of us.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Exactly! And wasn’t that a creative way to use a stereotype? He’s one of the best.
LikeLiked by 2 people
That’s absolutely fascinating. As writers, we always feel that we need to build the whole word picture, but he’s saying that we can let the reader’s own recognized stereotypes do the heavy lifting sometimes. Brilliant!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you, Barb, for letting me speak to your lovely audience and for sprucing up the presentation. You’re the greatest. Maybe this will inspire me to get back in the saddle.
LikeLiked by 1 person
This is such a great post. Kudos to you for taking a different look at things we all think we “know”.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Reblogged this on S.K. Nicholls and commented:
Visited the fantastic Barb Taub’s blog today with a discussion on one of my favorite topics, stereotypes in fiction.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Wonderful article! I loved what you said here (and the sentence after it): “But it also has a downside for writers because it makes us become afraid to offend somebody with our stories.” So true.
Great information. Always nice to come across a concept I haven’t seen explored before along my writing journey.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Thanks Carrie.Never wishing to alienate readers, I have done so with stereotypes, only because they didn’t read to the end to see the stereotype blast through conventions. People can be far too sensitive.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yes, sadly it’s getting that way.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Good job Susan.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Thanks for stopping in, John.
LikeLiked by 1 person
🙂
LikeLike
I like the Orson Scott Card quote about using a stereotype to set up readers for a surprise, possibly a shock. That may possibly happen in my memoir. Stereotypes in the hands of a skilled author can serve as an entry point for expanded character development.
You put a lot of thought and effort into this post, Susan. And, Mel Brooks, well . . . I remember Blazing Saddles from the 1970s. What a hee-haw!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks Marian. I give credit to Barb Taub for the Mel Brooks addition. She really did a fine job of complimenting my words with pictures and videos.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks!
LikeLike
That superhero comic is hysterical. I’d like to see one just as scathing revealing the gender wage gap.
Stereotypes bore me to tears. What’s so interesting about prejudice? It’s just a signal that a person is projecting their insecurities and lack of empowerment on an “other.” Round ’em up, label ’em all, now I know where I stand–but you gotta stand still in my mind so my own value doesn’t change in relation to you. You’re doing the heavy lifting for me, Stereotypical Whoever, I need you to show me I’m okay by being what I’ve labeled you. If you change or grow, I’m fucked. Dance, minion!
Any time a group or concept gets large enough and stagnant enough to birth a new stereotype and start squeezing out memes like puppies, I start packing my bags and checking the collective mental map for a new location to explore.
Intellectual tourism is its own reward; the more you side-step the labels and explore the lunatic fringe and exceptions to the rule, the more you find that stereotypes are just lazy heuristics for those who swim in the shallow end of life. Dive deeper and you’ll find waaaay more colors in the crayon box. So much more fun.
LikeLike
I particularly love Susan’s point that we can use stereotypes—especially those we tweak out of their comfort zone—to really focus attention on a character. Brilliant!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Donald Westlake once described a way of describing characters by first introducing them as a type and then mentioning one or two ways in which they vary from that type. I use that as a fast and dirty way of making background characters interesting.
For example, Stuart Dogs is a corporate lawyer and I describe him as a serious man in an expensive suit, but then I go on to mention that he is Cherokee and an outdoorsman who spends what little free time he has fishing. I don’t do a lot of characterization of him past that (he’s not in that many scenes) but the collision of two rather different stereotypes makes him three dimensional.
LikeLiked by 2 people
That sounds fascinating. I’m going to have to take a fresh look at my characters and see who needs some type-contrast to give them a more developed feel.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Great post! I’ve bookmarked it for future reference.
LikeLiked by 1 person
You’re right! I’D never thought about using stereotypes this way in writing, but can see it would be a useful tool… thanks for the tips! 😀
LikeLiked by 1 person