Tags
Amazon, Amazon requires $50 in purchases, book reviewers, book reviews, fake reviews, selling book reviews
An open letter to Amazon:
Dear Amazon,
I should be your Holy Grail. I’m the real deal, an actual reader who goes through books carefully, thinks about what they mean and how they’re written, and then writes a considered, thoughtful, and hopefully helpful analysis—in other words, I’m a book reviewer.
Writers, potential customers, publishers, and oh yes—you, Amazon—should be jumping for joy and giving thanks that I’ve taken hours to read and yet more hours to craft reviews for hundreds of books. Instead, Amazon, you’ve decided to punish reviewers like me.
In the name of discouraging “fake” reviews, your new policy requires reviewers like me to spend $50 on Amazon’s US site and even more, £40 on Amazon UK before I can share my review. Have you thought about other solutions, or the effect this will have on legitimate reviewers?
Amazon has figured out how to conduct millions of legitimate and secure transactions every day. Why isn’t some of this technology available here?
What about options like registering legitimate reviewers? Not making reviews public until the reviewer has posted a threshold number? Requiring reviewers to provide and confirm their identity with a credit card?
I’ve heard from several other book reviewers who recently were told they could not share their reviews with Amazon’s customers unless they first make purchases from Amazon. What are we all really hearing? We’re hearing YOU, Amazon, loud and clear, saying:
Listen up, you reviewers. Forget that you’ve already invested ten or twenty or more hours of your time. Forget that you haven’t made a penny for all those hours of work. Forget that the vast majority of books you’re reviewing aren’t going to get that Kirkus review, and instead are counting on unpaid reviewers for an honest and unbiased review. Forget ALL that and cough up $50 in purchases in exchange for the honor of posting your review on Amazon.
NOW who’s getting paid for book reviews, AMAZON?
Somebody is paying for reviews. The customers are paying by not seeing book reviews, the writer is paying by not selling books, and Amazon? Amazon is holding them hostage for their $50 in sales.
The Cozy Pages said:
Did not know they were now making a ‘minimum spend’ requirement. Jeez. And be sure not to say ‘in exchange for’ or use the word ‘free’ 🙄
LikeLiked by 1 person
barbtaub said:
For good or ill, Amazon has revolutionized the world of bookselling. Surely, they could get this one important thing right?
LikeLiked by 4 people
The Cozy Pages said:
Exactly!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Bernadette said:
This is a terrible business decision.
LikeLiked by 2 people
barbtaub said:
I completely agree.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Cathy said:
Reblogged this on Between the Lines ~ Books’n’Stuff and commented:
Great post, Barb. Sharing far and wide.
LikeLiked by 2 people
barbtaub said:
Thanks, Cathy. Not sure if we’re spitting into the wind here, but somebody needs to say the obvious.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Cathy said:
Absolutely!
LikeLiked by 1 person
brmaycock said:
I’ve found it so sad lately that when I look into Amazon reviews on books I’ve reviewed I can’t find other reviewer’s reviews even though it was the reviewers that influenced me to buy/ request
LikeLiked by 1 person
barbtaub said:
I wish WordPress had buttons other than “like” because I’d go for sad/angry/confused here…
LikeLiked by 1 person
Kassandra Lamb said:
Not to mention the fact that it is almost impossible to GET to the amazon site in another country than your own. If I plug amazon.uk into my browser, I am automatically rerouted to amazon.com. The only way I know of to get to amazon.uk is through my author dashboard, by clicking on “view on Amazon” for one of my books. My husband buys things on amazon.fr sometimes for our friends in France. He has to use an app that fools the computer into thinking he is in France.
LikeLiked by 1 person
barbtaub said:
I know what you mean. I just don’t know WHY they do it.
LikeLike
Romy Sommer said:
The UK store has a slightly different URL. It is amazon.co.uk
LikeLiked by 1 person
barbtaub said:
I think what Kass refers to is the fact that you’re automatically rerouted to your own country platform (unless you’re physically in the other country). If I go on Amazon.com, for example, I’m told to go to amazon.co.uk for book purchases. (Despite fact that I actually do have accounts on both platforms.)
LikeLiked by 1 person
Kassandra Lamb said:
That is what I meant, but I did have the link wrong. I can’t buy anything on there unless I’m having it shipped to someone in the UK.
Hey Barb, are you itching for anything from Amazon that’s over $50? I could buy something for you and you could buy something for me and then we could both post reviews on the other site. 😛
LikeLiked by 1 person
barbtaub said:
Actually… at the moment I’m good. (With the kids living in the US and the grandchild living in the UK, I have plenty of buying opportunities on both platforms.) But I’m furious when readers tell me they were unable to post reviews of my own or other people’s books because of the Amazon spend requirements.
LikeLike
Sue Vincent said:
And even though you qualify to post a review, nine times out of ten, the submitted review ‘doesn’t comply’ for some reason… none is ever given… After trying multiple times to submit it, only to be rejected without explanation, I have given up.
LikeLiked by 3 people
barbtaub said:
Sometimes I get angry and pursue it (for days) through online chatbots, etc. Amazingly enough, if you just keep asking enough people, they will (usually) relent and post. But you’re completely right—sometimes it just doesn’t seem worth the effort.
LikeLike
Sue Vincent said:
Every time I have tried fighting their system, they have not let me through. These days, I’ll try three times, the whole process, then give up. It does annoy me though. I have better things to do that write reviews that don’t get published and it is so unfair on the hardworking authors who deserve a review!
LikeLiked by 1 person
barbtaub said:
That’s really the problem. I can post my reviews to Goodreads and on my own blog, but there is an absolutely straightforward connection between the number of reviews a book gets and their sales figures. So I think that every time Amazon blocks a review, they are taking money from an author.
LikeLike
Sue Vincent said:
Yes, I agree… and that is both unfair and stupid as they too make money from our sales ( more than the authors, most of the time!)
LikeLiked by 1 person
virginiallorca said:
Book sales didn’t used to be dependent on Amazon reviews, frequently posted by someone with a personal agenda.
LikeLiked by 1 person
barbtaub said:
Like it or not, Amazon has changed the face of bookselling. They are the 800-pound gorilla and can certainly make all the rules. But they are trying to figure out this brave new book world too, and I think in this case, they made a bad decision.
LikeLike
Aislynn d'Merricksson said:
Amazon still doesn’t want my reviews… They removed all the the ones I’d posted over the has, and I can no longer post reviews for any products at all.. Oh, and that was with no warning g whatsoever.
I tried to debate it, and was told that I had violated the review policy, and because I did the reviewing professionally, those reviews could only be considered editorials. I mean, maybe I should be flattered…? But I only get ‘paid’ in books. I don’t earn a living doing the reviewing. I do it because I enjoy it. A book blogger or professional reviewer is a far greater asset to the reader and author than a review given 5* and “Great book! Loved it!” That’s not helpful in the least. But whatever. Amazon’s loss. My brother n law works for Amazon, and he couldn’t even get the decision reversed.
LikeLiked by 1 person
barbtaub said:
It really is an opaque process. As Nina (CozyPages) says above, “And be sure not to say ‘in exchange for’ or use the word ‘free’…”
LikeLike
Books,BooksAndMoreBooks said:
I had not seen that. I’ve never had a review turned down but I probably spend more than $50 a year on Amazon.
LikeLiked by 1 person
barbtaub said:
Well, frankly so do I. But I’ve been talking to so many reviewers who have indeed been blocked that I think it’s a serious issue.
And when I put on my ‘writer hat’, I’m even more furious at the thought that legitimate reviewers are being turned away.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Books,BooksAndMoreBooks said:
I agree it is a lousy policy. My sister read a book I asked her to read and review, but she doesn’t have an Amazon account, so she couldn’t. I know authors give away so many ARC copies and half of them can’t review on Amazon. It is really not fair.
LikeLiked by 1 person
barbtaub said:
It’s not just a matter of being fair or unfair. Like it or not sales are closely tied to reviews so preventing someone from posting a book review means Amazon is almost directly penalising the author in terms of sales.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Books,BooksAndMoreBooks said:
That is true.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Jessie said:
So true.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Mary Smith said:
It does seem an odd way to solve the problem of fake reviews. As you say, there are lots of options Amazon could put in place.
LikeLiked by 1 person
barbtaub said:
I can’t help thinking this policy change wasn’t well thought out.It just sort of appeared with very little fanfare.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Sarah Brentyn said:
I thought this had been the case for a long while now. Is there a new condition? Eek.
I’ve had major issues with reviewing even though I spent the required amount of money. Unfortunately, I agree with Sue. There are often problems even when we ‘qualify’ and they give no reason.
The worst part about all of this is they can wipe out everything with one click. They hold all the cards and they know it. You make good points but are they listening?
What the hell are they doing? Flinging bathwater.
LikeLiked by 1 person
barbtaub said:
You’re completely right! If it’s too hard to post reviews on Amazon, I’ll just post them on my own blog and call it a day. But the one who really suffers here is the writer who has put so much work into their book. Every missed review almost directly translates into missed sales.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Terry Tyler said:
That’s the problem for writers, isn’t it? We RELY on those reviews being on Amazon – I find that a great review on a book blog will give sales a boost for the day and the couple after that it comes out, but it’s the ones on Amazon that keep them ticking over – particularly after a book has been out for a while, and the book blog reviews are mostly done.
LikeLiked by 2 people
barbtaub said:
So blocking those reviews is like taking sales and thus money directly away from writers.
What Amazon is really saying is that people who are in a financial position to spend more than $50 (in multiple countries!) are worthy to review their products. The opinions of the rest of us (let’s just call ourselves “readers”)—who accept advance copies, or get them from libraries, or borrow them from friends—are NOT welcome on Amazon, thank you very much.
Amazon says it’s too hard to identify fake reviewers so this is their solution. The thing is, Amazon has no problem identifying real buyers, so clearly that technology is out there and available to them.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Terry Tyler said:
Exactly. And what they’re actually saying is, you must pay us for the right to review the products we are selling. Even though we are making money from the sale, but you review for nothing.
LikeLiked by 3 people
barbtaub said:
I’m sure Amazon would say that their message is they actually trying to support writers by eliminating fake reviewers, and it’s just too bad if that means legitimate reviewers are chucked out too. Oddly enough, I don’t think most writers—or readers—would agree.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Sarah Brentyn said:
Spot on: ‘the one who really suffers here is the writer…’ You really do make good points. I know fake reviews are a problem but, clearly, they have technology to deal with this differently. Also, like I said, they have messed with many writers/readers/reviewers who have paid their minimum in purchases. Their logic is…illogical.
I get what Terry is saying about relying on them, too. It’s a bad situation. Fingers crossed they (finally) get the message and figure out some other way.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Kara Post-Kennedy said:
This is total bullshit. And I say that as someone who spends $50 a month on Amazon even if I’ve fallen into a coma. What does my addiction to convenience say about my validity as a reviewer? ZERO, that’s what is says. This is total bullshit.
LikeLiked by 1 person
barbtaub said:
From your lips to Jeff Bezos’ ear.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Jacquie Biggar said:
I’ve been a loyal Amazon reviewer since 1998 (it’s tells you when you became a customer) and yet they decided to pull all my reviews recently ans sited I was in non-compliance. When I emailed them on the matter they quite rudely told me they didn’t need to answer my questions, it was final.
I’m now posting to Goodreads, BookBub (which has a great reader recommendation feature!) and my blog. To heck with Amazon!
LikeLiked by 1 person
barbtaub said:
The super weird thing here is that NOT posting reviews means less sales for writers…and thus less sales for Amazon.
And you’re completely right. I can (and do) post reviews on my blog and on Goodreads, etc. It doesn’t hurt me personally if I can’t get the review onto Amazon. But the writer who is counting on my review to boost their overall score, and perhaps help readers make buying decisions? Screwed.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Kassandra Lamb said:
I think your baby and bathwater analogy goes too easy on Amazon. It’s more like trying to kill a spy hidden in a crowd of bystanders by throwing grenades into the crowd. Yes, the spy is a serious problem but “solutions” that don’t solve the real problem but cause a lot of collateral damage seem to be Amazon’s M.O. And they are just so rude!! It’s beyond unprofessional.
LikeLiked by 3 people
barbtaub said:
Brilliant (if scary) analogy! And of course, you’re so right.
LikeLike
S.K. Nicholls said:
Irony that they won’t post a paid review and will even take one down if you show them that it was paid for, but they will demand payment for your right to review.
LikeLiked by 1 person
barbtaub said:
Somehow, knowing you, I’m guessing “irony” isn’t the first word you thought of, is it?
LikeLike
S.K. Nicholls said:
You know me well. Ha!
LikeLiked by 1 person
robbiesinspiration said:
I was aware of this policy, Barb. I know a number of people who can’t post reviews to Amazon. I do buy most of the books I review so this hasn’t been a problem for me but I agree that it is wrong. I like your idea of registering authentic reviewers.
LikeLiked by 1 person
barbtaub said:
If Amazon couldn’t identify proper buyers for their millions of transactions, they wouldn’t be in business long. Clearly, that technology is available to them.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Rosie Amber said:
This is seriously going to affect book reviewers, am sharing now.
LikeLiked by 1 person
barbtaub said:
I think this is a serious problem for reviewers, and that means it’s serious for writers, and a disaster for readers.
LikeLike
Rosie Amber said:
If only Amazon would cross-pollinate reviews across all sites, or put a link at the bottom of reviews on other Amazon sites. They already put a link to reviews on Amazon.com at the bottom of reviews on Amazon.co.uk, so they surely could do it the other way around?
LikeLiked by 1 person
lindahuber said:
I don’t count myself as a reviewer, but I do post very short reviews of most books I read, and something else that seriously bugs me is the ‘verified purchase’ tag. I buy every single book I review, but as I live in Switzerland I have to buy the kindle versions on Amazon Germany. My review is then ‘verified’ on Amazon Germany, and unverified on Amazon everywhere else. Some global thinking here wouldn’t go amiss…
LikeLiked by 1 person
barbtaub said:
I have the same problem! My reviews on other platforms don’t show up unless someone goes looking for them. What could Amazon possibly stand to gain by that?
LikeLiked by 2 people
lindahuber said:
Nothing at all 😦
LikeLiked by 1 person
Terry Tyler said:
What Linda said. Main point point being this – (translate for whichever country you are in) mostly, we can’t buy goods from Amazon.com in the UK. So we can’t make the purchases now needed to review on .com even if we want to. I spend loads of money on UK – of course it should be about what we spend at the company globally.
Meanwhile, the fake reviews carry on getting posted……
LikeLiked by 3 people
barbtaub said:
Amen!
LikeLike
Mick Canning said:
Grrr!
LikeLiked by 1 person
barbtaub said:
Couldn’t have said it better myself!
LikeLiked by 1 person
jenanita01 said:
Reblogged this on anita dawes and jaye marie.
LikeLiked by 1 person
barbtaub said:
I’m FAR more than usually grateful for the reblog. Thanks for helping me to spread this message.
LikeLiked by 1 person
jenanita01 said:
This message needed spreading!
LikeLike
jenanita01 said:
I just hope someone gives Amazon a commonsense pill, and soon!
LikeLiked by 1 person
barbtaub said:
Wow! I could use a few of those myself.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Claudette said:
How utterly nonsensical of them.
LikeLiked by 1 person
barbtaub said:
So “nonsensical”—that’s one word. I can think of a few others!
LikeLiked by 1 person
macjam47 said:
Reblogged this on BOOK CHAT and commented:
Barb Taub explains Amazon’s new change in their reviewing policy.
LikeLiked by 1 person
barbtaub said:
Thanks so much for the reblog. It’s so great of you to help spread this message.
LikeLiked by 1 person
macjam47 said:
My pleasure, Barb!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Smorgasbord - Variety is the Spice of Life. said:
Reblogged this on Smorgasbord – Variety is the spice of life and commented:
In the same vein as my rant the other day about being unable to post my review of UK2 by Terry Tyler on Amazon US unless I coughed up $50 to buy any item as long as it was over $50.. Barb Taub with an open letter to @Amazon… As authors we also pay commission to Amazon when one of our book sells.. surely that should qualify us to be able to review.. after all we are contributing to their bottom line.. Even though an Ebook may only provide them with a couple of dollars.. multiplied by the millions of authors on Amazon, even if they only sell one book.. is millions of dollars.. Just think how much more they would make if they had a professional and fairer system for reviews on books.. thanks Barb… we need more voices raising this issue across social media.
LikeLiked by 1 person
barbtaub said:
Thanks SO much for the reblog and for your thoughtful comments.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Smorgasbord - Variety is the Spice of Life. said:
It is a complex issue Barb and I share your frustration..xx
LikeLiked by 1 person
Teagan R. Geneviene said:
What an absurd, hypocritical practice. You tell ’em Barb! Sharing. Hugs.
LikeLiked by 1 person
barbtaub said:
Thanks Teagan! Let’s get the word out there.
LikeLiked by 1 person
ItsGoodToRead said:
Reblogged this on It's Good To Read and commented:
I review books cos I love them, and like to do my little bit to keep the love of reading alive. I was an Affiliate, thinking to give authors more places for their books to be shown and bought. I give fair and honest reviews, without wanting ANY monetary of financial inducement. This Amazon policy disgusts me, and I’ve revoked my Amazon Affiliate status. I’ll continue to review, and hopefully you will continue to enjoy the reviews, but won’t be back to posting to Amazon until this changes.
LikeLiked by 1 person
barbtaub said:
Thanks so much for all your work as a reviewer, and for not giving up. Hopefully, Amazon will come up with a better solution.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Pingback: Don’t throw out the baby! Why #Amazon doesn’t want your #BookReviews – It's Good To Read
Jane Sturgeon said:
This is a very constrictive ‘knee jerk’ reaction to fake reviews. Bad business practice, with sharp consequences. My heart sank….as I too, buy books, read them and post a review. This is not the way forward and will have a detrimental effect on indie authors.. Thanks for making us aware of this.
LikeLiked by 1 person
barbtaub said:
Thanks Jane—both for the reviewing you do, and for your thoughtful remarks.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Sharon Marchisello said:
I didn’t realize writing reviews on Amazon was such a problem. I have an Amazon account so have never had trouble posting one (although I do a lot more on Goodreads). But friends and fellow authors have told me they can’t post reviews to Amazon and I always figured it was just an excuse.
LikeLiked by 1 person
barbtaub said:
It really does seem that the wrong people are being punished by this policy. Hopefully, Amazon will rethink their stance.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Jessie said:
WHat!?! Is this why I couldn’t get my last review on amazon.co.uk to go through?!? Not cool Amazon… not cool…
LikeLiked by 1 person
barbtaub said:
The thing is, they never really tell you why something doesn’t go through. But yes, this is probably the reason. SO frustrating!
LikeLike
Alexandria Constantinova Szeman, Ph.D. (@Alexandria_SZ) said:
And yet, Amazon allows “reviews” that are not for verified purchases, and sometimes include only one word, like “crap” or sometimes a few more words, like “a piece of crap” on legitimate books. What a shame they’re using purchases to determine who gets to review books.
LikeLiked by 1 person
barbtaub said:
Haha! So true.
LikeLike
claire plaisted said:
Reblogged this on Plaisted Publishing House and commented:
LOVE THIS….Thank you so much for posting this blog, it is a side i didn’t consider. I must admit that I did wonder about the Paying for Reviews…part. It is sickening that they are doing this. Personally I will review anywhere except Amazon.
LikeLiked by 1 person
barbtaub said:
Thanks so much for the reblog, and for helping to spread this message.
LikeLiked by 1 person
claire plaisted said:
Welcome. It’s a great article 🙂
LikeLike
Stephanie Jane said:
This is very weird! I could understand if Amazon were restricting reviews only to verified purchases. ie only allowing me to review books I actually bought through them. Harsh, yes, but logical.
But to have a minimum payment threshold to include any purchases won’t stop the fake reviewers. It’s just Amazon being greedy.
I want to seriously rethink my affiliate links. Trouble is, my blog visitors practically only buy from Amazon 😦
Thanks for the heads up Barb
LikeLiked by 1 person
barbtaub said:
You’re right about people buying their books from Amazon. But Amazon is so worried about fake reviews that they’ve forgotten what they originally set up to do: sell books. Besides being unfair to writers, reviewers, and readers, their new policies are also costing themselves potential sales.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Let's CUT the Crap! said:
Are they kidding? How will this encourage reviews? How? Most likely discourage fan readership. How can this be a good thing? Only more money in Amazon’s till. Ugh. 😦
LikeLiked by 1 person
barbtaub said:
It’s not more money if they sell fewer books.
LikeLike
Ste J said:
Hopefully with thoughtful reviews and reviewers leaving Amazon, the buying public may look further afield for their reviews and swell our numbers bringing authors more into contact with bloggers and giving us more of a platform to engage with the writers.
LikeLiked by 1 person
barbtaub said:
I’d like to believe that, but Amazon is the gorilla in the room. At the moment, I can only see that this policy hurts writers, reviewers, and ultimately readers.
LikeLike
annerallen said:
I’m writing a blogpost on this on Sunday. But I didn’t know how bad things were until I read this comment thread. Amazon has screwed up, big time.
May I suggest we all start reviewing on alternate retail sites like Kobo, iTunes and B and N? Kobo is very customer friendly. I think it’s time.
LikeLiked by 1 person
barbtaub said:
I post on those sites if the book is listed there (and if the platform allows), but for indie writers especially, Amazon is the sale platform of choice. And thus they are the ones who are most punished by this new policy.
LikeLike
buffalopound said:
Retweeted to spread the news, Barb. This is pretty bad news.
LikeLiked by 1 person
barbtaub said:
Thanks for helping to get this message out. Hopefully, Amazon will reconsider their new policies.
LikeLike
shanayatales said:
I can so relate to this. I review on Amazon US, Canada, India, UK & Australia. And now I can only review on US & India sites, because I have transactions there. This is aggravating after spending hours & hours reading and crafting reviews without any real return. Sigh.
LikeLiked by 1 person
barbtaub said:
Like it or not, Amazon has changed the face of bookselling. They are the 800-pound gorilla and can certainly make all the rules. But they are trying to figure out this brave new book world too, and I think in this case, they made a bad decision.
LikeLike
Lucinda E Clarke said:
Reblogged this on lucinda E Clarke and commented:
Great idea, great blog.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Lucinda E Clarke said:
i think this letter is great. Any chance of getting it on an important desk? Reblogged.
LikeLiked by 1 person
barbtaub said:
Thank you so much for helping to get our opinions heard on this. Hopefully, Amazon will reconsider their policy.
LikeLike
olganm said:
I realised that yesterday. My case is further complicated because I’ve just moved back to Spain. I am a member of a group of reviewers and many of the writers and author are from the UK. At the moment I can still post in the UK, but not in Spain as I’ve not bought anything here yet, and that makes it tricky if I read books by authors from here (I used to be able to post reviews there before but not now). And in a few months I won’t be able to post reviews in the UK, and of course I haven’t bought in the US in years. I know there are problems with reviews, but this is not an answer. All your suggestions are better. We should copy this to Jeff Bezos…
LikeLiked by 1 person
barbtaub said:
I wish there was a way to tell Amazon (and Jeff Bezos in particular) about the damage this policy is doing to legitimate reviewers and writers and of course…readers. And that can only translate into damage to sales. Everyone loses.
LikeLike
lisaksbookreviews said:
Well done! May of my reviewer friends have been booted from posting reviews on Amazon. I’m sure I’m going to be any day now. Thank you for voicing what we have all been feeling.
LikeLiked by 1 person
lisaksbookreviews said:
That should of course say Many of.
LikeLike
barbtaub said:
And of course, it’s not just reviewers who are paying the price. Writers are losing good reviews (which, like it or not, translates into sales). Readers are losing their voice when they are blocked from reviewing. And ultimately, that will translate into losses for Amazon.
LikeLike
Pingback: The new policy on reviews and how it hurts everybody not only fake reviews – authortranslatorOlga
Tina Donahue said:
This isn’t about discouraging fake reviews. Amazon could care less about that. This is about them extorting more $$ from people. Pure and simple.
LikeLike
barbtaub said:
Amazon took a lot of grief for failing to police the reviews-for-sale and fake review postings. But blocking legitimate reviewers with spending limitations punishes everyone—the potential buyers who can’t get legitimate feedback, the writers who see a direct connection between reviews and sales, the readers who are blocked from reviewing by the spending and location limitations, and of course Amazon because at the end of the day, it means fewer sales for them.
LikeLike
James Osborne said:
Tell Amazon! Go the the Amazon page (Using Barb’s link above) and scroll down the the bottom. There is a comment box with three choices. One of them is “I don’t like this policy.” Go for it! 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
barbtaub said:
I did as you suggest. (Sadly, “I don’t like this policy” could apply to any number of aspects of it.)
If anyone else wants to join us, the link is:
https://www.amazon.com/gp/help/customer/display.html?nodeId=201929730&ref=sxts_snpl_4_3_3512391222&qid=1523823037&pf_rd_m=ATVPDKIKX0DER&pf_rd_p=3512391222&pf_rd_r=K81NAJDG6RK55QVPGZ6J&pd_rd_wg=Bpl2n&pf_rd_s=desktop-signpost&pf_rd_t=301&pd_rd_w=UXCsq&pf_rd_i=product+review&pd_rd_r=33e96a51-750d-4e65-a64d-3f34ac38a96c
LikeLiked by 1 person
James Osborne said:
Way to go Barb! Let’s hope millions will do the same thing. Perhaps Jeff Bezos might actually listen.
LikeLike
thebookwormdrinketh said:
I just ran into this on Amazon UK actually! I live in Canada and just reviewed a book for an author who lives in the UK. I figured it would make sense to post my review on the UK site as well since he may have more of a following there and it wouldn’t let me as I haven’t spent any money on that site… Well, I live in CANADA, so why would I order stuff from the UK?? I was very confused by how that would logically matter.
LikeLiked by 1 person
barbtaub said:
I completely agree! In fact, it’s a mystery why the reviews are divided by country platform in the first place. Surely, it’s a reader’s opinion that matters, not their location.
LikeLike
thebookwormdrinketh said:
Exactly!! 👍
LikeLiked by 1 person
Stephanie Jane said:
As a UK based reviewer, I can always see Amazon.com reviews pulled through to Amazon.co.uk especially when there aren’t many (or any) UK reviews already for a particular item so I know it’s possible for Amazon to do this, regardless of what language the review is in. Yet they never pull other country’s reviews through to the .com site
LikeLike
thebookwormdrinketh said:
Ya. I’ve had authors in the past tell me to make sure I put my review up on the .com site as it seems to be almost the central hub.
LikeLike
Pam said:
I read online that a person has to have purchased $50 worth of merchandise with one credit card over time — not just on the day they are writing a review. It’s to prevent employees of review companies who have many fake ideas from writing many fake reviews. Of course the article I read could have been wrong …
LikeLiked by 1 person
barbtaub said:
Every day, Amazon does millions of successful transactions, all of them online. They could not possibly remain in business if they don’t verify the identities of their customers. So clearly they have the technology to verify reviewers without requiring a large purchase. If reviewers had to produce a credit card in order to post a review, for example, I’m guessing that would be enough to eliminate review-selling organizations with multiple fake identities. And of course, the threat of “fake reviewers” doesn’t explain why Amazon won’t post reviews across country platforms. Surely, the opinion of someone doesn’t depend on their location?
LikeLike
Rainne said:
Reblogged this on Rainne's Ramblings.
LikeLiked by 1 person
barbtaub said:
Thank you Rainne, SO MUCH, for helping to spread info about Amazon’s policy.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Pingback: Don’t throw out the baby! Why #Amazon doesn’t want your #BookReviews | Ann Writes Inspiration
Pingback: GO WIDE WITH REVIEWS – Amazon Reviews – Plaisted Publishing House