As a newly published writer, I thought if I was asking people to review my books, I should be prepared to review other writers’ work. But to my surprise, many writers—actually most writers—refuse to review books. Sooner or later, you have to tell someone you know, or even like, that you do not like their book. It’s almost as easy as telling a new parent that you think their baby is ugly.
Recently an amusing and talented writer asked me to review her book. As it happened, I’d already read the book. Like her blog, it was funny and well-written. Only problem was that I really disliked the main character and the premise and well…the book. Obviously, there are better reviewers out there for her book.
I’m lucky. She was gracious and understanding. But I’ve heard other stories of writers who entered into long-lasting feuds on the basis of a negative review or even remark. Maurice Sendak, who received a terrible review in the New York Times from a young Salman Rushdie, called him, “That flaccid f**khead. He was detestable. I called up the Ayatollah, nobody knows that.”
So here’s my question:
To honestly review a book as a reader, not a writer… well, as we are all desperate for reviews it makes sense to do so, as long as you can separate the two. But I’d rather write reviews for what I have read through choice, in my own time and for my own reading plasure than agree to do them… and especially for those I know. My own books are odd enough 🙂
LikeLiked by 4 people
That makes sense, and is actually the approach most writers take. What I like is the surprise factor of reviewing something I would normally not ever pick up myself.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I like to read that way too… though these days finding time to read what I must is hard enough, without reading what I want! 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
I think all reviews should be honest ones. I don’t review books I didn’t like regardless of whether I know the person or not. I do not give five stars out automatically either! My author friends know this is how I work as I am completely upfront about it. It has caused some embarrassment sometimes but it is important to me the reviews on my blog are truthful and my blog is conducted with integrity.
I don’t think authors should enter into tit for tat reviews as it makes a mockery of the whole system and can lead to some awkward moments. Sue Vincent has the right idea – review the book your friend has written only if you have enjoyed it. Agree this at the onset between yourselves and it saves problems later.
There has certainly been an element of authors getting ‘payback’ reviews of their own books if they have disliked another author’s book but this sort of behaviour belongs in the playground.
Great post, Barb! Sadly, I know it is a problem which rears its head frequently between friends who are both authors.
LikeLiked by 4 people
I think Mom was right…If you can’t say something nice, it’s better not to say anything at all. Even when your silence speaks for itself.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I don’t promote myself as a reviewer, I just review the books I choose to read for pleasure so I don’t think I’d find myself in the position of having to tell another writer that I didn’t like their book. However I will say, hopefully kindly, if there were things I was so keen on in their book, that’s only sensible in my view as it gives potential readers a better idea when they’re making their decision.
LikeLiked by 4 people
That may work for you right now. The problem is that you’re a terrific writer, with an entertaining blog to boot. I’m guessing that as you get the recognition you deserve, it will come along with a fair number of unsolicited review requests. Maybe our best bet is to hide behind Rosie Amber’s capable self, and then just pick the books we want to review from her Book Review Team list.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Aww thank you Barb…(as she blushes graciously)… it’s a good point you make about the unsolicited reviews and I hadn’t considered this but as I’ve have started getting requests for author interviews from people I don’t know – which was not really the plan I guess that could come. I shall have to maybe put something on the blog to fend that off first I think!
Also the ‘was’ should have been ‘wasn’t’ obviously…tsk!!
LikeLiked by 1 person
I’ve found reviewing to be as big a learning curve as writing a book. I think reviews need to tell the reader a bit about the storyline, with a mention of the characters, what genre it is, then they can go on from there with what worked or didn’t. Sometimes this becomes a personal like or dislike or it can be about the editing or writing style. I try to be conscious of giving a potential new reader help with their choice as to whether they would buy this book or not.
I like a review which has the allusive magic to make me WANT to rush out and buy it, but not because someone said it was the next biggest seller or that it was rubbish because it wasn’t the reviewers usual genre. I suppose it’s like the ultimate search for a piece of paradise.
LikeLiked by 6 people
And, as usual, Rosie nails it.
(“ultimate search for a piece of paradise” ????? Like that’s not piling the pressure on for us reviewers or anything…)
LikeLiked by 1 person
I reviewed the self-published novel of a blogger friend. I actually spoke with him before I published the review on Amazon once I realized I was not “in love” with the book–he said he wanted an honest review regardless, so that’s what I gave him, and many kudos to him for his integrity.
I don’t know if writers should review books or not, but they should definitely read.
LikeLiked by 4 people
I completely agree, and the need to read—especially outside my comfort genres—is what started me reviewing in the first place.
LikeLiked by 2 people
On the face of it there shouldn’t be any reason for a writer not to review another writer’s book if they are being honest. IF THEY ARE BEING HONEST. And some writers DO give honest reviews. But many don’t. Even those that think they do may be sneaking an extra star in, “just in case”.
I think it is more of a problem from the reader’s perspective – I know it’s unfair, but if I see a review from a writer about another writer who I know is in their “support group”, it is hard to believe it is entirely unbiased (I have seen this happening within the traditional publishing circles, too – authors from the same publisher gushing about how wonderful a book is and giving five stars on Amazon – are the publishers themselves pushing this?). I think if you follow a particular author and see all of their reviews it may be easier to accept they are being honest, but if you see just one or two then suspicion rears its ugly head. But then if you are a “regular reader” you probably wouldn’t notice who the reviewer is anyway.
I no longer believe the puff quotes on the covers of books – I’ve been burned too many times.
From the writer-reviewer’s point of view, I’d say it’s probably safer not to review in any instance – too many eggshells to walk on with the other author. It is, of course, up to each writer what they do and each one has to work within their own code of ethics, but it might be worth thinking about what it looks like to an outsider.
LikeLiked by 4 people
You make some excellent points.
Here’s how I came to reviewing. I lived in a tiny (approx 60 household) village in the north of England. There were no other writers around. So if I read a book I liked, I would review it. Often, that led me to the author’s blog or email or some other form of contact. Over time, relationships developed, although I’ve yet to meet almost all of them. Does that mean that the writing that originally attracted me was off-limits for reviews of future work? I’m not sure of the answer to this. While I’m certain that I can remain objective, the real question is whether I’m perceived as having a bias that might actually hurt the writers I’m trying to praise.
I honestly don’t know the answer to this.
LikeLiked by 3 people
This is a tricky one. I suppose though that if I had a friend who was running a cake shop,for example and her cakes were dreadful, I would tell her, kindly, to her face. I wouldn’t review her cakes online and tell everyone else they were awful because she’s my friend and I care about her and that would be awful. If however, her cakes were fabulous, I would review her cakes everywhere I could, telling everyone how fantastic they are because she’s my friend and I care about her and I want her to do well. So if a writer friend’s book was bad, I’d tell her privately and certainly wouldn’t put up a false, positive review. If she took exception to that, I might have to think about our friendship! But if her book was good, I’d tell everyone. And if other people thought that was biased, well, people are going to think what they’re going to think.
LikeLiked by 2 people
I love this answer! But what if your friends’ cakes were just pretty good, not a mouthgasm? And you tried that new French baker across town whose cakes were better than chocolate and sex put together?
LikeLiked by 1 person
If they were pretty good the I think I’d try and give an honest review saying they were pretty good and worth eating! I wish I could find a french baker whose cakes were better than chocolate and sex though!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Reviews are critical for upcoming writers.
Thank goodness there is this medium that readers can use to express their thoughts about books.
Some folks are comfortable with being critical of others and some are not.
I am not.
As much as I want to write reviews to support fellow authors, I am not comfortable doing so as I tend to sugar-coat and only give five stars, even if I think the book deserves lower.
Lots of writers are fine with writing reviews.
Some get mad when fellow authors don’t write nice reviews in return.
Thank you bloggers for having the gumption to express your opinions in a fair and respectful way.
Cheers!
Your pal,
~Icky. 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
Another thing to keep in mind is that all writers (and reviewers) don’t have the same pressures driving them. I have friends who keep a roof over their heads with their writing. God bless them, I completely understand when they tell me they just can’t take the risk of making people mad at them for something they don’t really have to do (reviews). I get that. I’m in a different place, where I can coast after some successful years and my family doesn’t depend on every cent I bring in.
My grandmother used to ask, “Were you under the bed?” I can’t be under every other writer’s bed, so I just have to assume we all do what is best for our own circumstances.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Oh, as you can probably imagine I have much to say about this. Of course we should write reviews, but only if we really, truly have the guts to be honest. I’ve given ‘bad’ reviews out (by which I mean reviews that would probably not encourage anyone to purchase), and no-one has killed me yet. With a book you didn’t enjoy much, you can be honest but diplomatic, honest but still pointing out what’s good about it, rather than just saying ‘this is a piece of boring shite’. BUT – no reviewer is under obligation to do the constructive criticism thing. Can I say it again? Yes, yes, I’ll allow myself to do so. AMAZON IS A BOOK SHOP, NOT A WRITERS’ SUPPORT GROUP.
So my answer is this – yes, if you are going to be honest, be that honesty sugar coated or not (and there’s nothing wrong with saying things kindly). No, if you’re too scared to say anything negative in case someone doesn’t give you 5* back. No, if you see it as a tit for tat/exchange, etc. No, if you use the review facility to run down books you think are your ‘competition’.
As for the guy above who doles out 5* to be nice – perhaps he’d like to refund the approximately £30 I’ve spent over the past couple of years, on books that I bought because they had brilliant reviews, that I read only to discover they were substandard. My fault for not downloading samples, I know! If you don’t review honestly you become part of the problem, ie, the reading public thinking that Amazon reviews are rubbish. IF YOU PRAISE EVERYONE, YOU PRAISE NO-ONE. How do I know you’re not lying about mine, too?
As for writer friends reviewing each others’ books – well, sometimes you become friends with someone because you admire each others’ work. There are a few writers who enjoy my books as much as I enjoy theirs. It’s nice. There are others who like mine, but I don’t read theirs because they write vampires or romance, or one of my other no-nos. Similarly, there are those whose books I read, who don’t read mine.
Now I will shut up and go back to my WIP. Which I am still not sure isn’t a heap of crap, 85K words in!!!
LikeLiked by 4 people
As you know, I have a slightly different take on this. I think that it’s so SO hard to write a book, so it’s hard for me to slam anyone who has gotten that far. If it’s not one I am sure I can give three stars to, I’ll tell the author that there might be other reviewers out there who are a better fit. I’ve done this many times, and not once has anyone ever told me to go ahead with my review. And here’s the thing…I’m a selfish, kind of lazy, into gratification reader. So I actually will not read a book I don’t like. That’s too much like work.
Of course, when it comes to reviews, I’m thus a freeloader. If a book has one or two-star reviews, I take a look to see what the reviewer’s objections were. I just don’t write those reviews myself.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Ha, ha! I DON’T want to be the guy responsible for giving you a bum steer, Terry, which is why I don’t write reviews. 😉
LikeLike
You said you give 5* reviews for book that you don’t think are that good, IT, which is why I said that! Quote “I tend to sugar-coat and only give five stars, even if I think the book deserves lower.” Sorry, I perhaps misunderstood?!!! 😉 5* means a great book, one you loved. Doling 5* out like sweets to be nice to people is exactly the sort of thing that makes people say that all Amazon reviews are from friends or back-scratching authors.
Barb, I disagree, I think you and I have exactly the same outlook – you give critical but balanced 3* too! I don’t have a policy of not give lower, but I very rarely DO (on my book review blog there are just 2 x 2* and 1 x 0*, but that was more of a joke), simply because I don’t sit through an awful book!!! I don’t accept review requests, though, so the problem doesn’t arise, generally. I have, in the past, told a friend I wouldn’t review her book because there were too many proofreading and editing errors, so a review wouldn’t be that positive. Kinda like you, really! I expect this post will run and run…!!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Hi Terry.
I apologize, I was not clear in my first post.
I had a tendency to WANT to give out five stars, but as that is unethical, I did not.
I do not write reviews.
LikeLike
Reblogged this on Barrow Blogs.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks so much for the reblog! I really appreciate it.
LikeLike
An honest review, please, even if it hurts. All I have so far are short stories. I’m in the last stages of getting a novel out there.
I just ask that you, point out the thing(s) that makes you not like the book. If it’s just not your genre, that’s not the authors fault and nothing the author can fix. But if the book has real problems, pointing them out can help the writer to make it better.
If the entire book is a mess—well—that’s another problem.:-) As a rule I would try to find at least one good thing and comment on what the writer did well, instead of all the bad.
I might point him/her to some good books on writing as well. 🙂
I’m old, tough and easily amused—I laugh at one star reviews—then I take a second look and see if the review was justified. Many times it helped me.:-)
LikeLiked by 2 people
I applaud you for your bravery and thick skin in demanding a truly critical review. But I agree with Terry above that it’s not really the reviewer’s job to give you a detailed critique of how to make your book better. The time for those honest, critical reviews is BEFORE you hit that publish button. That’s when you send the book to beta readers, critique partners, maybe even a terrific editor if you have the spare change rattling around.
LikeLike
Barb, I agree with you—it’s not the reviewers job to give a full critique—sorry if I sounded that way.
I think that if a reader doesn’t like your book and bothers to tell the world, it’s nice if they give the writer a hint of why they don’t like it. Same if they love it.
I thought reviews were kinda like mini critiques—learned something today! 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
Reviews are for readers, in my book, Ms Countrythings! However, I will say that I used to review with only the reader in mind, but I’ve changed my mind on that a bit now I’ve seen how helpful they can be to the author, too. Recently I gave 3* to a debut novel and 2 others had the same complaints about it. The author contacted Rosie (of book review team fame) and thanked her for the guidance she’d been given, saying she would use the comments to improve. Now THAT is one sensible person – but a shame she didn’t get a critique first, because those reviews won’t help her sales.
Yes, as Barb says, once you’ve pressed the publish button the book is out there, for the buying public who just want to know if the book is good enough to buy or not. That’s why so many people say “don’t rush to publish”. I think indie writers used to be able to get away with slack work, but everything is so much more competitive now.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I hear ya! 🙂
LikeLike
My keyboard is defective, it has too many commas on it!!! 🙂
LikeLiked by 2 people
Minefield. Absolute minefield. I don’t review under my own name, so that’s how I get round it. And I don’t tell people I’m reviewing their book.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Sigh. It is a minefield. Bless you for providing the reviews though. I’ve read your writing, and so I’m sure your reviews are equally sharp.
LikeLike
I review books on the grounds that I want other people to review mine. Not tit for tat, I’m happy to learn from a critical review and of course people’s tastes differ.
I do make a point, however, of only posting 3* or above. If I rate it less than that I will contact the author directly with my reasons, and most times they’ve been grateful for the feedback
I try to structure my reviews as a critique, after a plot summation I start with good points, only mentioning negatives after that, then sum up who I would recommend the book to, and possibly, who should not buy it!
So far that seems to be working (2 years and around 30 reviews) so I shall keep on doing it and hope I don’t upset too many people – I believe it’s important to be honest, and writers should do their homework before asking for a review – first check out the reviewer’s existing reviews!
LikeLiked by 3 people
ps, can I do this, Barb? If you don’t like me putting a link of mine on here, please do remove! I wrote an article about authors reviewing authors a while back, that those who have commented on this might like to see, too – it’s got a stack of comments that might interest them, as well.
http://ukartsdirectory.com/terry-tylers-literary-blog-29/
and here’s the follow-up to it.
http://ukartsdirectory.com/terry-tylers-literary-blog-30/
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks Terry for these terrific extensions to the conversation.
LikeLike
Deborah, I have to say that I agree with you. (see here). When you tell another writer that you can’t review their book, do you tell them why?
LikeLike
I do, and I offer them my critique if they wish to see the detail. I’ve only had one person ignore me so far, others have been only too pleased for the feedback,
I’ve worked for years with a highly professional critiquing group, and am well used to couching things in positive terms, which helps!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Deborah Jay, that’s the kind of review I like. Helpful, honest and not hurtful. 🙂
LikeLiked by 2 people
😀
LikeLike
Yes, yes, yes! All writers should read, and all readers should write reviews.
That being said. I, too, will send the author (if I know them) a note for less than a three star and not post it, but do read the one and two stars that are posted. Why??? I dunno.
I don’t accept review requests, but do try to reciprocate. Can’t say that’s always worked out well for me. I’ve been asked to review work and had to tell authors their work wasn’t for me. That really bites. Then again, I’ve had folk tell me the same about mine 😉 That bites, too. sucks it up
LikeLiked by 2 people
I agree. (Especially about the biting…)
LikeLike
This is a really tough one! I think on balance that I would review for a friend or acqaintance, but if it was likely to be 3 star or less by my own Goodreads standards, I think that I would keep the review offline but instead offer diplomatic thoughts privately if I felt it would look worse to say nothing. Book club politics!! Thought provoking post.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I’ve opted out of writing groups that seemed to be little more than a political minefields—ego strokers to the anointed few. I’ve had critique partners who ran a spectrum from gushing to bloodletting. So I get where you’re coming from. And I do think that encouragement is always a nice way to go.
Probably the mother with the ugly baby isn’t really fooled by me saying enthusiastically, “What a healthy baby!” But the baby is already here, too late to suggest she might have done better with a different DNA mix. And who is to say? That baby could (and probably will) grow up beautiful and brilliant at something. The writer I can only praise faintly (and privately) is growing with every book produced, and has a chance of producing something beautiful and brilliant too.
But only if they’re not too publicly humiliated and privately discouraged to try.
LikeLiked by 1 person
A number of people have mentioned that they would review for friends, but if they couldn’t give a good review, they would give no review, or offer thoughts privately. I can’t argue with that. But would it not be better for writer buddies to read the books BEFORE they are published? Then you can really help your writer friend, who can choose whether or not to take on board your suggestions, and may even be able to use a comment as a puff quote.
LikeLiked by 2 people
To me, those are two completely different functions. Critiques are for writers—for before a book is published, when it makes sense to ask everyone who is willing and appropriate to be beta readers, writing group members, critique partners, or even editors. But reviews are for readers—the scorecard of how the writer did, what works and what doesn’t.
Both critiques and reviews are critical. They just have different audiences and purposes. Or, as Terry Tyler so brilliantly puts it, AMAZON IS A BOOK SHOP, NOT A WRITERS’ SUPPORT GROUP.
LikeLiked by 1 person
They are two different functions – that’s my point. If a writer doesn’t want to leave an honest review of a friend’s less-than-wonderful book, but is willing to tell that writer in private, and they are going to read the book anyway, they would be better off offering to beta read. But I’ll shut up now. I understand what you are saying.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Ah. I think we were saying the same thing. In which case, I completely agree with your brilliant point!!
LikeLiked by 1 person
I always review what I read, and if I like it, I’ll post the review on Amazon and Goodreads.
If I DONT like it, or if I think there are flaws, I will generally always let the author know privately.
Also, I don’t take free books and review them (except from a very few close friends)
At the end of the day, it’s only 1 man’s opinion, and they are like a….eholes – everyone has one! 😉
Cheers!!
John
LikeLiked by 1 person
A reader who always reviews? You’re not “only 1 man”, my friend: you’re a god!
LikeLiked by 1 person
This is really a difficult question. I’m not a writer (of books, only on my blog), and I’ve often noticed that mostly indie published writers cross-review their books. On the one hand I was wondering if someone would dare to write something negative when you know the author can review your book too. (Probably not). On the other hand, I don’t know if indie authors can find someone else who would review their books.
LikeLike
Indie authors have as much chance of being reviewed on Amazon or Goodreads as a traditionally published author. If they have built up a following before publishing by being active (and honest and as themselves) on social media or by blogging, they will have early readers who will review their books. Many bloggers (at least four I know who have commented on this thread) will review indie books.
(Although I said I’d shut up, this is a subject very close to my heart and the main reason I started reviewing, so I lied when I said that.)
LikeLiked by 1 person
This is interesting to know. What I see mostly on social media are indie authors who review books of other authors, or are reviewed by them. Sometimes my news feed is a bit clogged with all this book promotion, and I have to admit that I sometimes mute them on Twitter.
LikeLiked by 1 person
“so I lied when I said that”… Bwahahah!! I hope you never shut up because it’s pretty entertaining stuff.
LikeLiked by 1 person
It’s so interesting reading everyone’s comments and, as a reviewer I try to be as honest as possible without undue negativity or tactlessness. I appreciate the time and effort (not to mention blood, sweat and tears!) it takes to complete a book and if my review is less than my 3* limit, I contact the author/publisher to see if they still want me to review. I know fairly quickly if this is the case and don’t want to waste time reading something I’m not invested in, if the review is not required. Up to now no-one has said yes. I think writers definitely should review if they want to. There are always going to be those people who can’t take criticism, constructive or otherwise, in which case they probably shouldn’t be putting stuff out there in the public domain.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Reblogged this on and commented:
A very interesting question posed by Barb Taub
LikeLike
As others have said, a difficult question. I’m a writer and a reader and since self-publishing myself, I’ve had my eyes open to the world of self-published authors and their work. When I read something I like, I want to let other readers know that. It can be risky but I suppose I hedge my bets. I don’t review a book unless I can give it four or five stars. Perhaps, I wasn’t the right reader for that book. Writing is difficult – who am I to judge. Great post.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks for weighing in. Do you ever tell writers why you’re not reviewing their books?
LikeLike
That’s the really difficult part. A couple of times, when the story is superb but other issues are really getting in the way of my reader enjoyment, I’ve taken the plunge and sent the author an email to explain. I’ve never been attacked or vilified for doing this (thank goodness) but at the same time, it was clear the author didn’t want my take on things. Now, I simply don’t do anything and hope that the other author has heard the same advice I have. If someone doesn’t review your book maybe it’s because they don’t think their review will be particularly helpful. It’s best to just let the whole thing go.
LikeLike
Lots of people don’t want unsolicited critiques, I think, Francis. Or just can’t take any criticism, I don’t know! Alas, many don’t understand that there is more to writing a good novel than thinking of a good plot. Or don’t want to accept the fact that they may just not be a very good writer – that’s something that few people ever dare say or acknowledge, isn’t it?
LikeLiked by 2 people
Reblogged this on Shewrite63 and commented:
As a general guideline, I refrain from reviewing friends’ books. Some commenters here have already pointed out the obvious problems of hurt feelings or potentially awkward relationship status. I will use my Goodreads or Smashwords presence to provide ratings and short reviews.
TJ
LikeLike
Thanks so much for the reblog, and for your contributions to the discussion. Do you provide ratings and reviews publicly for less than 3-stars?
LikeLike
Hi. I’d have to check my ratings and review history but am pretty sure that if I didn’t enjoy a book and was tempted to rate it with less than 3 stars, I wouldn’t rate or review it at all. If I don’t enjoy a book enough, I wouldn’t spend the energy unless it warranted a warning to others about untruths and really shoddy research.
LikeLiked by 1 person
A writer should review books as a reader. I like to choose which books I will read and when . I don’t mind writing reviews but would never submit a bad one. 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
I have to agree with you. But it does raise the question—is there a place for bad (less than 3-star) reviews? I know that I don’t post them either, but have to confess that I read them!
LikeLike
This has become a really dicey issue for most writers, particularly as you get into various groups or begin to know more and more people who write and whose books you will read. I have found myself in deeply uncomfortable situations with writers I’ve grown to like as people, but did not enjoy their work. What do you do?
First of all, I refuse to do swaps, as there’s no way at all to make those fair and unbiased (“they gave me a 5-star, but I hated their book, but I have to give it a 5-star too or they’ll hate me, right?!!”… said far too many swapping reviewers!).
Since I very much believe in being a fair reviewer, the only thing I could think to do was write a blog article explaining that I won’t leave reviews on books that don’t capture at least 3-stars of my approval and I don’t review every book I read. Hopefully, that allows anyone concerned to presume I either haven’t read their book or I didn’t like it well enough to leave 3 or more stars.
But ugh, it still can get sticky. Wisely, I don’t tell most writers if/when I’m reading their books, so there can be no subsequent expectations or hurt feelings either way. I want to be fair and honest, but I also don’t want to devastate anyone.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Have to agree with you about the swaps. They just can’t come off as anything but smelly, no matter how pure the intentions. And, on the other end, the crushing power of the one-star rating is pretty scary too.
I think that the absolute financial and bottom-line impact of the low-star review is also a factor for why I (and many other writers who understand the power of Amazon and even Goodreads) avoid them. Sadly, it’s also a reason for some to use them irresponsibly.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks for initiating this conversation! I’m tweeting it enthusiastically.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks for spreading the word. Here’s another topic that I’ve been thinking about. What is the role of the one and two-star review?
LikeLike
To counter all the dishonest 5*, perhaps. To give the other side. I wrote a 2* recently, for a trad pubbed book that had a fair bit of hype – it was awful, and half way through it I thought, what IS this crap??? Like you, I read them. If they’re intelligent, I take note. If they say ‘I can only assume all the 5* were written by friends of the author’, I take note. Once a book gets read by more than 100 people, there’s bound to be some who would give it below 3*, and one of those may take the time to do so. If a book has more than 3 or 4 reviews of a low star rating, I take them into account, especially if they all make the same complaint and seem fairly considered. However, if someone bothered to log on to write a review but can only come up with ‘load of rubbish’, I assume they’re a bit thick and maybe didn’t ‘get it’!!!
LikeLiked by 1 person
As a reader and a reviewer, I love to hear what authors have to say about the books I choose to read. As for how a writer may react if you opt not to review their book, I have been very fortunate to never had a complaint. I always contact the author and explain why I will not review their book. The reasons I have declined have had to do with subject matter or genre. There have been a few occasions where an indie author rushed to get their book out and it needed too much work to be an enjoyable read. Since my blog is about promoting the authors and books I enjoy, I do not give highly negative reviews. If I can’t give three stars, I don’t review it. The authors I have contacted have been most appreciative that I have declined under these circumstances. One author asked if she made changes, would I consider giving her five stars. My policy is to review a book once.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Interesting. I’ve never had an author ask me to repeat a review. But when I was just getting started as a reviewer, I contributed to a trade site. One book was so flawed I wrote a 2-star review with a detailed critique listing the editorial, structural, and writing issues. The trade website (where the publisher was a paying advertiser) allowed them to resubmit the book (with only the title changed!) and another reviewer produced a glowing review–which the publisher touted via the trade website’s most expensive advertising space. Feeling cynical about the process, I stopped reviewing for them. But a while later I realized that they were absolutely right. If I can’t give a good review, it may well just be that I’m not the right audience for that book.
LikeLiked by 1 person
That’s why I don’t like to give a negative review. Just because it’s not my cup of tea, doesn’t necessarily mean it’s not a good book.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Um…. here I am again. I have just read a glowing review for a book, so interesting it made me almost make that click – until I commented thus, and the reviewer privately advised me not to, because it was so boring she had to drag herself through it. Had I not been told this, I would have bought the book based on the review. And been bored rigid, wasted my time and money.
I’m guessing she and the author are friends….
I saw your tweet about nice winning out over real. I see that most writers are saying that they won’t review if they can’t give 3* – that’s all good. As long as ‘nice’ doesn’t become ‘lying’ 🙂
LikeLiked by 2 people
And now I’m also wondering (because my head just works that way) if there isn’t a gender element. I notice that men rarely say they wouldn’t review unless they could say something nice. Of course, I write genre/fantasy/romance. Have to say that my readers tend to be women for the most part.
LikeLike
Somehow, I see an enormous canyon between “only review books I like” and “write a fake glowing review”. Both are self-serving in their way, but since reviews are for readers, it seems wrong. And mean.
On the other hand, I could understand if the reviewer adds a half-star for diplomacy while still listing all the issues she sees in the book. At least that way the reader will have the information the reviewer has.
For example, if I give 3 1/2 stars to a book that mostly hits the romance tropes (meet cute/ fight/ kiss-kiss/ HEA), but I tell readers that I found the plot thin and character development nonexistent, they can make up their own minds about the importance of those points to what they’re looking for from the genre. But if I give it 5 stars and say it’s like Shakespeare wrote Romeo & Juliet with a happy ending, I’ve lied to everyone and basically told my readers not to bother believing anything I say from here on out.
I will have wasted everyone’s time, my reader’s money if they buy the book based on my recommendation, and most of all, my credibility.
LikeLike
I voted ‘yes’ as I believe reviews are a hugely important part of the process – giving and receiving. I try to review everything I read on Amazon (if purchased on this platform), or on Goodreads if I’ve been on a shopping spree in Waterstones! Only recently have I added a couple of reviews on my blog. I did this because I loved the book (regardless of whether I liked/or know the author).
Last year I read a book that was truly awful and for the first time I spoke up and explained why I felt this way. It had more to do with lack of editing and no spark for the characters, but I felt dreadful after submitting the review. The author on the other hand was very gracious and appreciative of my comments (I gave good feedback then the bad!).
I was very fortunate to have received a wonderful review from you Barb, a review that gave me a step-by-step break down of what you enjoyed, what hadn’t worked for you and the characters that you liked/disliked. I must have re-read that review a hundred times over because it was so helpful to me as a new writer. Moving on to the editing stage of book two I have been able to take your comments and work on my characters and hopefully improve on their story.
I don’t think I would have received such an honest and helpful review from a reader. As a writer (or book reviewer/blogger) you can spot the holes and flaws that a casual reader may not pick up on.
As a huge YA fantasy reader I try to remain open minded about other genres I read and review. Just because I like my books to have several zombies, three dragons and a wizard doesn’t mean everyone will feel the same. When I read romance, historical. crime or non-fiction I try to be as honest as I can. If I don’t like a part of it I will explain why it didn’t work for me.
Really interesting post Barb, and some great comments too 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
Okay, I have to admit—you had me at “I must have re-read that review a hundred times over”. That officially makes this my favorite comment ever!
LikeLike
Giving out a glowing review is unfair to both reader and author if it’s not genuine. Shelley makes a good and relevant point in that a well constructed and honest review can help if the author is willing to take it on board. I do think though that a writer comes at a review from a slightly different, more technical maybe, angle; than me anyway. I’m not saying that applies to all bloggers/reviewers.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Interesting premise. If people can keep ego and friendship out of it then sure, review the book honestly. If it will cause problems steer clear. Just my two cents.
LikeLiked by 1 person
It’s a tough place to be in for sure! My personal policy is to only review books I’ve enjoyed by writers I ‘know’. I’m also a really easy to please reader and don’t spread a lot of negativity about books I don’t particularly care for. I’ve slowed down on reviews though because I’d rather spend that time either writing or marketing!
LikeLike
A friend of mine just have me a copy of her book for an Amazon review…after reading about Sendak, I hope I have good things to say….
LikeLiked by 1 person
It’s always a scary moment. But kudos to you for taking on the challenge!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Lol…the first challenge will be getting to her book…there’s just so much going on right now with writing/teaching/parenting/grad school. And maybe that’s part of why people run into trouble with negative reviews – I tend to be less supportive in my feedback when I’m stressed. It gets worse if you’re busy – I imagine the “hey this book’s okay gotta run” review can come off as negative if you’re not careful…
LikeLiked by 1 person
Just remember… there is no law that says you have to love a book. You can certainly tell someone (even a friend) that while you can see the good points, it’s just not a work that you’re a good fit for as a reviewer.
LikeLike
Pingback: Writers as Reviewers | Rereading Jane Eyre
Pingback: Ten things I loved about you, 2015 | Barb Taub
Such an interesting thought actually! Apart from my blogging, I’m not a writer myself so perhaps not qualified to comment really, but when you do publish your work, you have to expect criticism – whether positive or negative. I think it’s great to get feedback no matter what side of the fence the review is on, as long as it’s justifiable and obviously not downright rude!
LikeLiked by 1 person
A lot of writers I know are worried about creating bad feelings if they are asked to do a review and then don’t like the book. And it really does happen. I know of two cases where the person requesting the review held a LOOOOOONG and public grudge about the results.
LikeLike